You Think You Are Smart but Its Only Art

Gray Matter

Brian Kisida , Jay P. Greene and

Credit... Alain Pilon

FOR many education advocates, the arts are a panacea: They supposedly increase examination scores, generate social responsibility and plow around failing schools. Most of the supporting evidence, though, does lilliputian more than than found correlations between exposure to the arts and certain outcomes. Research that demonstrates a causal relationship has been virtually nonexistent.

A few years ago, nevertheless, we had a rare opportunity to explore such relationships when the Crystal Bridges Museum of American Art opened in Bentonville, Ark. Through a large-scale, random-consignment study of school tours to the museum, nosotros were able to make up one's mind that stiff causal relationships do in fact exist betwixt arts education and a range of desirable outcomes.

Students who, by lottery, were selected to visit the museum on a field trip demonstrated stronger critical thinking skills, displayed college levels of social tolerance, exhibited greater historical empathy and developed a taste for fine art museums and cultural institutions.

Crystal Bridges, which opened in November 2011, was founded by Alice Walton, the daughter of Sam Walton, the founder of Walmart. It is impressive, with 50,000 foursquare feet of gallery space and an endowment of more than than $800 million.

Thank you to a generous private gift, the museum has a program that allows school groups to visit at no cost to students or schools.

Before the opening, nosotros were contacted by the museum'southward education section. They recognized that the opening of a major museum in an area that had never had one before was an unusual event that ought to be studied. But they likewise had a problem. Considering the school tours were being offered costless, in an area where most children had very little prior exposure to cultural institutions, demand for visits far exceeded available slots. In the first year alone, the museum received applications from 525 schoolhouse groups requesting tours for more than 38,000 students.

As social scientists, we knew exactly how to solve this problem. We partnered with the museum and conducted a lottery to fill the available slots. By randomly assigning school tours, we were able to allocate spots fairly. Doing and then also created a natural experiment to written report the effects of museum visits on students, the results of which we published in the journals Educational activity Next and Educational Researcher.

Over the course of the post-obit twelvemonth, most 11,000 students and almost 500 teachers participated in our study, roughly half of whom had been selected by lottery to visit the museum. Applicant groups who won the lottery constituted our treatment grouping, while those who did non win an firsthand tour served as our control group.

Several weeks after the students in the treatment group visited the museum, we administered surveys to all of the students. The surveys included multiple items that assessed knowledge about art, as well as measures of tolerance, historical empathy and sustained involvement in visiting fine art museums and other cultural institutions. Nosotros besides asked them to write an essay in response to a work of art that was unfamiliar to them.

These essays were then coded using a critical-thinking-skills assessment program developed by researchers working with the Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum in Boston.

Further, we directly measured whether students are more likely to return to Crystal Bridges as a result of going on a school tour. Students who participated in the study were given a coupon that gave them and their families free entry to a special exhibit at the museum. The coupons were coded and so that we could determine the group to which students belonged. Students in the handling group were eighteen percent more likely to nourish the exhibit than students in the command group.

Moreover, most of the benefits we observed are significantly larger for minority students, low-income students and students from rural schools — typically two to three times larger than for white, heart-course, suburban students — attributable possibly to the fact that the tour was the start time they had visited an art museum.

Further research is needed to decide what exactly about the museum-going experience determines the strength of the outcomes. How important is the structure of the bout? The size of the group? The type of fine art presented?

Clearly, nevertheless, we can conclude that visiting an art museum exposes students to a diversity of ideas that challenge them with dissimilar perspectives on the human condition. Expanding access to art, whether through programs in schools or through visits to area museums and galleries, should exist a central part of any schoolhouse'southward curriculum.

peltierthenizeena.blogspot.com

Source: https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/24/opinion/sunday/art-makes-you-smart.html

0 Response to "You Think You Are Smart but Its Only Art"

Post a Comment

Iklan Atas Artikel

Iklan Tengah Artikel 1

Iklan Tengah Artikel 2

Iklan Bawah Artikel